836134202e
The existing test can be solved with the following:
```rs
while let Some(integer) = optional_integers.pop() {
assert_eq!(integer.unwrap(), range);
```
Similarly with `expect(...)`, `unwrap_or(0)`, `unwrap_or_default()`, etc. However, none of these solutions use the learning point of stacking `Option<T>`s.
The updated test can _only_ be solved by stacking `Option<T>`s:
```rs
while let Some(Some(integer)) = optional_integers.pop() {
assert_eq!(integer, cursor);
```
With the updated test, using `unwrap` or `expect` will panic when it hits the `None` value, and using `unwrap_or` or `unwrap_or_default` will cause the final `assert_eq!(cursor, 0)` to panic.
40 lines
1009 B
Rust
40 lines
1009 B
Rust
// options2.rs
|
|
// Execute `rustlings hint options2` or use the `hint` watch subcommand for a hint.
|
|
|
|
// I AM NOT DONE
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
mod tests {
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn simple_option() {
|
|
let target = "rustlings";
|
|
let optional_target = Some(target);
|
|
|
|
// TODO: Make this an if let statement whose value is "Some" type
|
|
word = optional_target {
|
|
assert_eq!(word, target);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn layered_option() {
|
|
let range = 10;
|
|
let mut optional_integers: Vec<Option<i8>> = vec![None];
|
|
|
|
for i in 1..(range + 1) {
|
|
optional_integers.push(Some(i));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let mut cursor = range;
|
|
|
|
// TODO: make this a while let statement - remember that vector.pop also adds another layer of Option<T>
|
|
// You can stack `Option<T>`s into while let and if let
|
|
integer = optional_integers.pop() {
|
|
assert_eq!(integer, cursor);
|
|
cursor -= 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cursor, 0);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|